Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:10 am

California is removing its most controversial driverless car rule

Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:04 pm

California is removing its most controversial driverless car rule
Chris Davies · Oct 11, 2017

Autonomous cars in California may do away with the human backup driver behind the wheel, with newly proposed regulations amending one of the most controversial aspects of the current rules. The California DMV had opened up its regulations for driverless testing and deployment regulations earlier this year for public input, releasing a new version today that includes significant changes to what companies working on self-driving cars are required to do should human intervention be demanded.
Currently, according to California’s rules, autonomous cars being tested on public roads require a person be physically present behind the wheel at all times. Though the car might be driving itself, the human operator must be in a position to step in and take over if the situation gets beyond that of the autonomous systems.
It’s a requirement that has been widely debated among companies and teams working on driverless projects. On the one hand, unplanned disengagements – that is, times when the autonomous system either turns itself off because it’s unsure how to deal with specific road conditions, or when a human operator has to assume control – do still happen, despite the maturity of many of the systems. The contrasting argument, though, is that given the advanced nature of the systems, mandating a physical presence is no longer practical.

Still, so far it has been demanded, hence companies like Cruise Automation, the GM-owned self-driving startup, and others who are operating closed trials of self-driving vehicles have still had to include an operator whenever their cars are on the road. It’s this that the newly proposed driverless testing and deployment regulations addresses.
Previously, the regulations stated that the vehicle could not be “operated or drive, without active physical control by a natural person sitting in the vehicle’s driver’s seat. That’s been removed in this updated version, with the DMV arguing that it was needlessly restrictive to continue demanding a person in each test vehicle.
“The word “both” has been replaced with “and/or” to indicate that the hardware and software can be either in the vehicle or remote. This amendment was necessary because requiring the technology to be “both remote and on board” could be unnecessarily limiting on the development of the technology; changing it to “and/or” provides the flexibility that the technology can reside either entirely, or partially, on or off-board.” California DMV
The regulations also add a new term, “minimal risk condition.” That’s defined as the low-risk operating condition a driverless vehicle will automatically return to should the car’s autonomous systems fail or if a human operator doesn’t take over. That, too, can now be remotely managed according to the updated regulations.
Interestingly, the DMV doesn’t specify what method any remote safety driver might use to interact with the driverless vehicle, only saying that there must be a way to constantly communicate with any occupants. In the case of a crash, a contact must be available 24/7 to respond to any other drivers or emergency services on the scene. That potentially opens the door to a distant operations center where safety drivers monitor autonomous vehicles and can take over from their keyboard, leaving all the seats in the car itself free for passengers.
Assuming no further problems or arguments arise in the next fifteen day public comment period, the new set of rules will be handed over to the state government to finalize. They could go live as early as mid-2018.
crazy crazy stuff - will the public be notified that a self driving vehicle is on the road?

Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:58 pm

Re: California is removing its most controversial driverless car rule

Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:55 am

You might find this goes along well with the thread ... -01473519/

Waymo’s head of self-driving technology Dmitri Dolgov recently took to the Internet to reveal that the company saw a big improvement in its autonomous tech last year. According to a disengagement report from the California DMV, the number of times Waymo had to disengage its self-driving technology for safety-related reasons dropped from 0.80 times per thousand miles in 2015 to 0.2 times in 2016. This was despite a 50-percent increase in the number of miles driven last year.

In 2016, Waymo drove a total of 635,868 miles in the state of California, an increase of 50-percent compared to 2015’s total. Despite that increase, the company’s ‘reportable disengages’ decreased from 341 in 2015 down to 124 for last year. Most of the driving time was performed on ‘complex urban and suburban streets.’

A disengagement, in this case, is an instance in which a self-driving car’s autonomous system has been disengaged so that a human has to take over operation. The reasons for a disengagement can include a safety situation on the road, but may also be for non-safety related things, including updating software and more.

Overall, Waymo has driven its self-driving cars in autonomous mode for a total of 2.3 million miles since its start. Testing includes things like merging into (human-driven) traffic, navigating through construction zones, changing lanes, dealing with unexpected objects in the road, and more. Check out the SlashGear Cars Hub for more automotive and self-driving news!

Return to “Off Topic”